Seminar Series 2017/2018

Tues Sept 5th  2:00-3:30 (ANSO 207)

Gary Fine (Northwestern)

Group Pleasures: Collaborative Commitments, Shared Narrative, and the Sociology of Fun

Abstract: As a consequence of their size and fragility, small groups depend on cohesion. Central to group continuation are occasions of collective hedonic satisfaction that encourage attachment. These times are popularly labeled “fun.” While groupness can be the cause of fun, we emphasize the effects of fun, as understood by participants. Shared enjoyment, located in temporal and spatial affordances, creates conditions for communal identification. Such moments serve as commitment devices building affiliation, modeling positive relations, and moderating interpersonal tension. Further, they encourage retrospective narration, providing an appealing past, an assumed future, and a sense of groupness. The rhetoric of fun supports interactional smoothness in the face of potential ruptures. Building on the authors’ field observations and other ethnographies, we argue that both the experience and recall of fun bolsters group stability. We conclude by suggesting that additional research must address the role of power and boundary-building in the fun moment.

Watch Gary Fine’s talk here now

Tues Sept 26th 11:00-12:30 (ANSO 2107)

Douglas John McAdam (Stanford)

Putting Trump in Historic Perspective: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Postwar America and Today

Abstract: The turbulent onset of Donald Trump’s administration, to say nothing of the president’s oversize presence, has so focused our attention in the moment, that we’re in danger of losing critically important historical perspective. Trump’s rhetoric and behavior are so extreme that the tendency is to see him and the divisions he embodies as something wholly new in American politics. They are not, nor in broad relief, is the president. Instead, Trump is only the most extreme expression and product of a brand of racial politics practiced ever more zealously by the Republican Party since its origins in the 1960s. Drawing on the argument and evidence presented in Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Postwar America, Stanford sociologist, Doug McAdam, will use his talk to put the rise of Donald Trump in historical perspective and to briefly highlight the threats to American democracy that preceded his rise and which, indeed, helped him win the White House.

Watch Douglas John McAdam’s talk here now

Tues Oct 31st 11:00-12:30 (ANSO 2107)

Clayton Childress (U of T)

Under The Cover: The Creation, Production, and Reception of a Novel

Abstract: Starting in the early 1970s, in sociology and allied disciplines the studies of cultural production and reception began to split apart. Likewise, while applications of field theory to cultural production and reception have generated no shortage insights about the internal orders within fields, for the most part empirical analyses have stopped short at the relationships between fields. What are the consequences of both of these of arrangements? Through following a novel in real-time all the way from its authoring, into its publishing and selling, and then to the reading of it in 21 book groups, this talk reveals how decisions are made, inequalities are reproduced, and novels are built to travel in the creation, production, and consumption of culture.

Watch Clayton Childress’ talk here now

Tues Jan. 9th 11:00-12:30 (ANSO 134)

Michaela Desoucey (NC State)

Gastropolitics and Contested Tastes

Who cares about foie gras? As it turns out, many do. In the last decade, this French delicacy—the fattened liver of ducks or geese that have been force-fed through a tube—has been at the center of contentious battles between animal rights activists, artisanal farmers, industry groups, politicians, chefs, and foodies. This talk focuses on the multivocal nature of foie gras’s American “gastropolitics,” defined as cultural conflicts over foods or culinary practices located at the intersection of social movement activism, cultural markets, and legal regulation, and interrogates the complexities of what it means to identify as a “moral” eater in today’s food world. In particular, I argue that foie gras is not an inconsequential issue for the small size of its industry or its lack of cultural resonance in American culinary practices, as some might posit. Rather, I argue that it is symbolically precarious – an exemplar of how combining moral politics and the culture of markets makes our relationship with food complex.

Tues Feb 6th 11:00-12:30 (ANSO 134)

Viviane Namaste (Concordia)

“Sa w pa konnen pi gran pase w” Knowledge of the history of AIDS and the case of Haitians in Montréal

Abstract: This presentation will present the results of an empirical research project on the history of AIDS in Montréal’s Haitian community in the 1980s. Fundamental to this research are questions of knowledge — how we understand the history of the AIDS epidemic (habitually associated with gay men in its early years in the North American context), and the kinds of knowledges that are too often ignored. Drawing on interviews with organizers, nurses, and Haitian community leaders, I consider how and why Haitians responded to the AIDS crisis, and what this history can tell us about how we know the AIDS epidemic in North America. The presentation will explore links to the legacy of Kaspar Naegele in two ways: firstly, with regards to matters of epistemology and society, and secondly with respect to the substantive work of nurses in health care.

This talk is the Naegele Memorial Lecture, 2018.

Tues March 6th 11:00-12:30 (ANSO 134)

Laura Hamilton (EC Merced)

College Outsourced? The Family-University Partnership and Its Costs

Abstract: Involved college parents—frequently referred to as “helicopters”—are often derided as pesky interlopers who micromanage their children’s lives and make excessive demands on school decision makers. An entire generation of supposedly coddled and entitled youth is considered the byproduct of this problematic behavior. Do involved college parents damage their children and burden universities? To answer this question, Professor Hamilton followed the families of 41 young women as they moved through a public flagship. She interviewed the women every year for five years, asking about parental relationships and support, and interviewed both their mothers and fathers as women neared graduation. She found that intensive parenting is a logical response to the harsh risks facing young people during college and early adulthood; however, not all parents are able to offer assistance. Moreover, involved college parents are also highly desired by universities, as they solve institutional problems posed, in part, by the privatization process. As public funds dwindle and accountability pressures mount, institutions are looking elsewhere for support. Parents are drawn into the labor of producing successful students—assisting with recruitment, advising, psychological support, career development, and even student safety. This form of cooperation between public schools and wealthy families has important hidden costs, as it exacerbates both gender and class inequality.

Tues April 3rd 11:00-12:30 (ANSO 134)

Paula England (NYU)

Gendered Cohort Trends in Having Sex with Same-Sex Partners

Abstract: In the U.S. there has been a marked increase across birth cohorts in the proportion of women who have (ever) had sex with a same-sex partner. Increases among men are much smaller. I theorize that the gender difference reflects the more general tendency for the gender revolution to legitimate “gender bending” change for women more than men.